LOS ANGELES
IN THE STREETS,
OF THE ANGELS,
THE WORLD ON FIRE.
IN THE STATE,
OF SAINT LOUIS,
AMERICA SPINS TRUE.
IN THE RACE,
OF HOPE,
WHO GETS THE BILL?
IN THE HOPE,
OF A HEAVEN,
HOW THROUGH WE SEE?
WITH DIVERSITY,
ON TRIAL,
GOVERNED BY LAWS.
WITH OR WITHOUT,
ON WE GOVERN,
GOVERNING BY LAWS!
WITH OPPOSITES ATTRACTING,
ON WE JOURNEY,
UNITING IN HOPE!
WITH A BUSH,
ON FIRE,
WHAT DID WE SEE?
J. PETER HOGAN
MAY 12,1992
[Note: Due to Hollingsworth v. Perry and DOMA this week I dug up
this old poem written first to be primarily a poem as a journalistic
covering of the Rodney King news. As that was so it was also
written to live as part of my collection THE CHARGE OF NEW
FEDERALISM and as the opening piece for such. A meaning that
may go lost in it is that of Rodney King basis as well as a meaning as
meant to have been a neurological concern for fires in President Bush’s
brain and his capacity in those days to handle being so “on fire” and as too
much like Lincoln then as of having kept the world together as like of a
civil warring by Saddam Hussein. For its name alone I don’t see how
justice can be served with SCOTUS allowing loose language confusion
of “same sex marriage” to be of a affirmation by them while really of a
request for different sex right and not same sex rights as those of those of
different sexes as of the rights from their Creator to working further
creationism.]
[Note: Yes this was one of my last pieces of my new PC
political correctness in a fuller and better new way to write
generally and less racially and so such still as much before
the Clintons had been long in trying to sound like I was with
the more earlier works of my THE CHARGE OF NEW
FEDERALISM collection. The Clintons were a huge
disappointment about such though greatly to personal political
benefiting to themselves. The Clintons still have the story to be
told as I know it of them of being immoral by/with their choices
to do less for an available greater good in their times and for special
spousal selfisness - for having worked to make positive change
meant for all get worked to be more polarizing and political in a
great partisanship and to working then for fewer people generally.
As per this poem it still is remembered that they like to read it as of
the one primary meaning it was meant to be not about while stirring
such consideration to be yet in the general air of concerns for professionalism
at least for those much of Los Angeles and Hollywood.]
IT MUST BE
AN ANTI-MATTER
MATTER
SO DIF BE IT
A SAME
NOT A SAME
NIXY SEXY
SO DIF
MATT’D SAME
NO TOO TO
SAME SEX
“SAME SEX”
FIRST THE COSMOS
OF REAL MATTER
& SAME AS DIF
NO TO TOO
“SAME SEX”
O DIFFERENT SEX
NOT FAIR
FOR GREATER RIGHTS
THENCE WHENCE IF
OH NO - OH, NO!
NOT THE SAME O
THE SAME - IT BE DIF
CAN’T HAVE IT LEGIT
AS THE SAME FOR SAME
AS SAME AS FOR DIF
CAN’T HAVE IT LEGIT
AS FOR DIF AS SAME
AS SAME FOR SAME
IT CAN’T BE
SAME SEX FOR ALL
AS DIF SEX FOR SAME
IT CAN’T BE
DIF SEX FOR DIF SEX
AND “SAME” FOR SAME
ONE CAN BE NATURAL…
ONE OTHER TWO UNNATURAL…
… FAMILY MARRIAGE LAWS
BUT SAME SEX MARRIAGE
NOT BUT A BLACK HOLE
OF ILLEGIT ANTI-MATTER
NO TO “SAME SEX MARRIAGE”
AS SUCH ISN’T FAIR TO DIF
TO DIF SEX COUPLES AS DIF
AS PER PUBLIC RESTROOMS
AN UNFAIRNESS TO “SAME”
AND GOODBYE TO DIF SEX HEADS
A DOMINO EFFECT TIPPIN’
SO SWEAT THE REST OF HEADS
GREATER RIGHTS TO SAME IF TO “SAME”
NO, AGAIN, TO “SAME SEX…”
IT NOT THE SAME BUT DIF
IT CAN’T BE “SAME” IF DIF FOR SAME.
J.P.HOGAN
[LATE NIGHT SUPREMELY RISEN INSPIRED LINGUISTIC CIVILITIES AS POSTED & DATED]
A refreshed
ocularity as per the
US Constitution as
a purposed dedication
as a spectacle
of & for the
New Testament Senator
Rand Paul is sightable for
standing tall on
the original spectacle
o‘ such and not efforts since
to cloud - to cloud
our First Amendment barring
of Congress from a “re-specting” per
the original humble spectacle o’
the founders in
their
unanimaty.
Our First is
that it is not
“Congress may pass
no law abridging
freedom of religion”
but is
what it is
as a referencing
to the spectacular bold
establishment in
the New Testament
with “Congress shall make no law
respecting an
establishment of
religion…”.
It is an odd turn o‘
law for citation siting
and sighting
since it seems for all
the other ways it could have been
written to be, as it has been
recently suggested to be,
o’ meaning,
it fits only with
the above attempt
o’ sharing that
a re-establishment has become
popular - more popular than the
attempts to a popular post-Constitu-
tionalism convenient to a new
marching for secular
socialism.
It seems
popular
now that it is
re-established
that the First
Amendment is phrased
just so to
survive the phases
o’ distrust and assaults
with “respecting”
critical only if
a “spectacle” existent
already in
an establishment o’
religion.
It is a well -
well set odd phrase so o’
the “do ordain and establish” o’
o’ the humble “subscribing”
under God
so that “Year of our Lord” o’
our Founders’ Christianity and
its calender as o’
else could they have barred Congress
from infringing o’
o’ the struggle
in America
for freedoms
to be o’ the type o’
Christians - Christians so
many were trying
to be?
For the oddity
of the First
to work o’
o’ not a useless o’
random wordiness
it seems
there both
has to be - be o’
o’ an ‘establishment
of religion’
already
and it
as a “spectacle”
o’ o’
“spectacular”
(boldness?)
for there to be
“respecting” bar for Congress
to be
to any law o’
o’
“re-specting.”
So it seems
our Founders established
o’
o’ humbly
under God
in that Year o’
o’ their Lord o’
o’ that our Constitution
is a spectacle o’
o’ an establishment
in the New
Testament
and
the establishments there o’
o’ in of
“marriage”
“creation”
and all
therefore of
man and women.
So technically we
may not -
may not have freedom -
Freedom from religion
O’
o’ but such that
local jurisdictions
may render
o’ of.
Hmmm?
J.P. Hogan
[Rejustified Facebook.com/jpeterhogan status posting - (more) poetic of 25th March of 2013]
[note: What to do with popular attempt long of suggesting we could just say we are now in a post-Constitutional new world order and like President Obama with his 2nd Inaugural can be legally of such spectacle of his of orating like: I just swore the oath - BUT!!! I won’t feel beholden to it or our Constitution…?]
This is “poetic” if about analysis as per “poetic license”:
And, now with retired Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William
Jefferson Clinton’s recent remarks spoken about marriage and otherwise
directed contrary to hers as for union rights for same sex couples: Mrs.
Clinton I guess you should tell us how your marriage is supposedly
legal about all this to the fullest range of detail and transparency fair to
differentiating what seems the contrariness in your interpretation of limits
of marriage union of souls as per yourself and that which seems more
idealistic and fuller as per the hopes of those wanting same sex marriage
rights. It seems same sex couples don’t want the reworked convenient
interpretation of marriage that you practice as if is not is but when is by
whimsy and with your law degree seeming a power greater than your
joined wealth and souls, and one to supersede such of natural law animalism.
>>>> TWO SHEETED TO THE WIN <<<<
> A STUDY IN A/THE “HOLDING” COMING <
HAVE THE CON SCRIPTS SO LIBERAL
BEAT TOO LONG AN ORBIT
A RECYCLING CYCLING OF
A CLINTON DOUBLE CON
THERMO FAM NUCLEAR
PEACE WHEN WAR
WAR WHEN PEACE
A PLAN’D IT WHEN NOT
A MASH’D WHEN PLANNED
A SCRIPTING BEAT WRIT NOT
CONSECRATED BUTS
SO SPOUSAL’D HUSBANDRY’D
A TOMORROW FROM TODAY
WRITS NOTS TANGENTIARY
GEOMETRICAL PLACIDITIES
NINE SQUARES TOO TOO MUCH
PLANETARY OR PLAN’D ACTUALLY
LIBERALISM A LOST ORBITATION
A NATIONALIZATION CON SCRIPT’D
AN IDEALISM LOST NOW
AS IF A PLUTO UN-PLAN’D-ETARY
IF NOT FOR TOMORROW AS
IF NOT FOR YESTERDAYS TO
AND TOMORROWS AS YESTERDAYS SET
STILL A WRIT LESS A CON SCRIPTED
LESS ORBITAL OR TANGENTIARY GALACTIC
WHAT IS A LIBERALISM POST
WHAT IS A GEOMETRICAL PEACEFUL
COPACETIC PLAN’D O WRIT LATITUDE
HOW A LONGITUDAL ATTITUDE FORWARD
OF LESS THAN RIGID CONSERVATISM
AND NOT AN IMBALANCED TILT BIASED
GAMED AS IF OF INDEMNITIES SCRIPT’D
WHILE TURNED AND SPINNING RADICAL’D
HOW THERE LIBERALISM - THEIR LIBERALISM
HERE NOW GUILTY BEFORE PROVEN WHAT
HERE NOW NOT INNOCENT AS PREJUDGEMENTS
LOST LIBERALISM ARTS AS A NEW PLUTO NOT
HER VENUS DE MILEAGE’D
HIS MARTIAN SPOUSAL’D HUSBANDRY’D
OUR “PEACE” THEIR ORBITALLY - SPUN OUT
HOW SPIN SO TANGENTIALLY A DEATH
A PASSING OF HONORABLE LIBERALISM
A TIME O FEMIFEST DESTINY GLOBAL THERM’D
O NUCLEAR LIBERALISM BOUNCING NOTS
A GAME SO WRIT DANGEROUS
A GAME CON’D A CLINTON DOUBLE CON
TOO NUCLEAR & OUT OF ROTATIONS “GAMED”
HOW HATH AN HONORABLE LIBERALISM PASSED
HOW HATH AN ARTFUL TO DRAMATIC DODGE’D
PASSED OUR ‘INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY’
NOMENCLATURE’D WRIT SCRIPTS PROTECTORATES
LEFT OUR GALACTIC UNIVERSALS
LEFT OUR PLAN’D ORBITS O GOVERNANCE
LEFT TO OUR CONS & SCRIPTS NOT WRIT LARGE
NINE SQUARES - A LOST PLUTONIC SOCRATIC
A GAMING NOW POST PHILO - PHILOSOPHICAL
A DOUBLE THERM’D SPOUSAL’D SUCCESSIONARY
A DOUBLE CON - BUSTED - AND SPUN OUT NUCLEAR
A YANKEE DOODLED DANDY - UN-PLANETARY
AN OLD SAW KEPT PRUDENT TO PROCEDURES
CIVILITIES SET FOR CIVILIZATIONS AND ART
NOT LIES FOR LIES OF A LIBERALISM ESCAPISM
NOT A GAME OF WARS PERCHANCE CON’D
& SPINNING NOT A CYCLING ORBITS EXTRA-C
HOW GOES VENUS WAYS AND SAID MARTIANS
LOST LIKE PLUTO MUCH LIBERALISM ARTS
AN ART OF THE DODGE TO BUY ATTITUDE
ATTITUDE LATITUDES O ARTFUL DODGERS
ESQUIRED LOTS - EMPTY CHAIR(S)
THERMO FAM NUCLEAR
PEACE WHEN WAR
WAR WHEN PEACE
A PLAN’D IT WHEN NOT
A MASH’D WHEN PLANNED
A SCRIPTING BEAT WRIT NOT
CONSECRATED BUTS
HOW LOST OUR LIBERALISM AS AN ART
HOW LOST A PLANETARY GALACTIC PLUTO’D
TOO SOCRATIC NOW - RIGHT?
A LIE OR LAY OF LIBERALISM WHENCE
THENCE A UNIVERSAL ATTITUDINAL
A BUYING OF JUST TIME TO ESTABLISH
A BUYING OF JUST TIME TO PRESERVE
A KEPT ENCLAVE FOR INNOCENCE FIRST
A KEPT ORBIT MORE PLUTO’D & SOCRATIC
OF AN OUTER REALMS SECURED LONGITUDE
A LIBERALISM FOR A JUST ART OF A DODGE
HOW LOST NOW TO GLOBAL THERM’D NUCLEAR’D
HOW PAST TO SUCH FROM NINE SQUARES
SET SO ADRIFT AND ALIENATED BY
SPOUSAL’D HUSBANDRY’D TOO LIBERALIZED?
J.P. HOGAN
[FIRST DRAFT HERE AS POSTED & DATED]
>>> NEW TITLE IN THE QUEUE <<<